NAME: BHATT URVI P.
ROLL NO. : 31
STD: M.A. (SEM-3)
SUB: English Language teaching-1
PAPER NO. : 12
TOPIC: What role do environmental factors play in language teaching and
learning?
SUBMITTED
TO: DEPT OF ENGLISH M.K BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY
What role
do environmental factors play in language teaching and learning?
Introduction:
The term second
language acquisition refers to the process through which some acquire one or
more second or foreign languages.
English is taught in India
as second language. In Indie a very interesting situation operates. India being
a multilingual country, English serves as a link language across the nation. It
is also a language in which a lot of Indian literature is being written- that
is to say, literature by Indians, about India but in English.
It must be remembered that a
language is not an isolated entity. It is deeply rooted in the socio-cultural,
religious, etc. Concept of the native speaker’s life. In a wider sense, it
represents across time and space the dynamic nature of these aspects. As stated
above, when a language is used in a non-native context which has a different
socio-cultural pattern, but not for expressing this non- native culture, it
remains a foreign language, like French, or German or Russian are in India. But
under these very circumstances, when it comes to be used to express the non-
native culture and becomes a means of communication in some domains from
interaction, it becomes a second language and is precisely in it is exploited.
The results are very interesting, especially linguistically.
The objectives of the language teaching:
Teaching is not a unidirectional process of
pumping bits and pieces of unrelated and undigested gobbets of knowledge into
empty sacks. It is a bidirectional, interactional process. Learners are not
just passive recipients of socially accepted language patterns. They play
active role in this teaching- learning process. They actively strain, filter
and recognize what they are exposed to. Their imitations are not photographic
reproductions but artistic recreations. The learners are meaning- makers. The
main objective at every level of teaching should be to help learners learn how
to draw out their latent creativity.
Background:
Family Background and the surrounding also
play an important role in the acquisition of language. A child acquires
language very quickly. If the family of the child speaks first language, the
child would have no problem while learning. But for teaching the Second
Language, if created, can be helpful. The acquisition is quicker in suitable
environment.
If the family is
educated, the acquisition is fast. If the student is the resident of urban
area, there is possibility of the learner to be quicker. The types of tasks in
which learners engage and the number of participants in a task also affect
learner’s participation. Studies have been conducted on learners’ participation
in tasks involving pair work, group work and the whole class.
The term acquisition
was originally used to emphasize the sub- conscious nature of the learning and
acquisition has become largely synonymous.
There has been much debate
about exactly how language is learned, and many issues are still unresolved.
There are many theories of SLA, but none are fully accepted by all SLA
researchers. The SLA can be divided into five Stages:
Ø The first stage is preproduction which is
also called silent period. At this stage learner can’t yet speak.
Ø The second stage of SLA is early
production. During this speaker starts speaking short phrases of one or two
words.
Ø The third stage is known as speech
emergence. At this stage learner starts speaking simple sentences. Grammatical
errors occur.
Ø The fourth stage is called intermediate
fluency. Learner starts using complicated sentence structure. They do make
frequent errors
Ø The fifth and final stage is said to be the
stage of advanced fluency. The ability of learner is quite near to that of the
native speaker.
Language acquisition in children:
Swiss Psychologist- Jean Piaget
was development psychologist rather than learning theorist. He studies the
nature of children of different ages can benefit teachers. He provided a
tenable ides in regard to the nature of learning process.
For Piaget the term
‘Genetic epistemology. ’Genetic’ means, developmenter and ‘epistemology’ is a
theory of knowledge acquisition. Piaget’s genetic epistemology is developed to
a study of the development stages of children as they relate to their
acquisition of knowledge. Piaget studies were biologically oriented and he
gives prominence to psychological factory he gives secondary place to cultural
factors in explanation of human behaviour. He says that development of a child
consists of a succession of three stages or periods.
Each stage
extends the proceeding periods reconstructs it on a new level, and later
surpasses it an even greater degree.
The process in development is
assimilation and accommodation. Assimilation consists of filtering or
modification of the input from the environment. Accommodation consists of the
modification of one’s internal skill to fit reality.
v The
different stages of acquisition in children:
Stage- 1
During the first stage from birth to 18 months
or 2 years, an infant lacks any symbolic function and so displays no direct
action on reality.
Stage- 2
During the second stage from 18 months to
the age of 1 or 8 years a child uses differentiated signifiers.
Stage- 3
During
the stage of concrete operations from 7/8 years to 11/12 years a child
internalizes actions as related to objects but he or she does not yet use
verbally stated hypothesis. Such hypotheses appear only in the periods of
preadolescence.
Every learner is born with a
built- in language- learning mechanism. This mechanism gets activated when the
learner is exposed to that language. What is, therefore, essential is to create
an atmosphere where learning can take place. Children learn the language they
here around them. Exposure to a rich variety of linguistic material is as
important in first language acquisition as in second language learning. The
teaching of English as a second language, in particular, has often been less
successful than it might have been, as a result of the restricted variety of
linguistic contexts with which students are provided. Learners should ideally be
exposed to a variety of contextualized language materials. They must here and
see language in action.
Social Environment:
The idea of the social environment plays a
major part in an individual’s cognitive and affective development was modelled
by Bronfenbrenner (1979), who described the environment of a developing person
as being similar to a Russian doll. He stated that the individual’s environment
can be represented as a set of concentric interactive Layers. Their continues
interaction with each other and with the individual defines the possible routes
of development. Although based on this model numerous studies have been
conducted concentrating on the validity of the model in different
circumstances. I know of no research which aims to describe the nature of the
influence of the attitudes and motivational roles of the social environment on
the attitude of adult EFL. Learners at non- company courses. Therefore, the
present study intends to validate a questionnaire with which it is possible to
draw up a model of this interrelationship.
[Kovacs’s model of adult EFL learner’s
social environment]
A figure shows,
in my model there are two social environmental circles, the first being the
immediate micro- environment that consists of family and friends. I included
these people who in in adult life represent the Private environment and process
the most personal information about the individual adult EFL learner. the other
circle, the exo- environment, comprises the workplace, the language teacher and
the language school. For adult EFL learners these do not attitudes of these two
major facts influence the attitudes and motivations of adult EFL learners.
Some students learn a
new language more quickly and easily that others. This simple fact is known by
all who have themselves learned a L2 in School. Clearly, some language learners
are successful by virtue of their sheer determination, hard work and persistence.
However there are other crucial factors influencing success that are largely
beyond the control of the learner. These factors can be broadly categorised as
internal and external. It is their complex interplay that determines the speed
and facility with which the new language is learned.
Internal
Factors:
Internal factors are those that
the individual language learner brings with him or her to the particular
learning situation.
Age:
SLA is influenced by the age of the learner.
Children, who already have solid literary skills in their own language, seem to
be in the best position to acquire a new language efficiently. Motivated, other
learners can be very successful too. But usually struggle to achieve native-
speaker equivalent pronunciation and intonation.
Personality:
Introverted or anxious learners usually make
slower progress, particularly in the development of oral skills. They are less
likely to take advantage of opportunities. More outgoing students will not
worry about the inevitability of making mistakes. They will take risks and thus
will give themselves much more practice.
Motivation:
Intrinsic
motivation has been found to correlate strongly with educational achievement. Clearly,
students who enjoy language learning and take pride in their progress will do
better than those who don’s.
Extrinsic
motivation is also a significant factor. ESL students, for example, who need to
learn English in order to take a place at an America university or to
communicate with a new English boy / girlfriend, are likely to make greater
effects and thus greater progress.
Experiences;
Learners who
have acquired general knowledge and experiences are in a stronger position to
develop a new language than those who haven’t. The student, for example, who
has already lived in three different countries and been exposed to various
languages and cultures has a stronger base for learning a further language than
the student who hasn’t had such experiences.
Cognition:
In general it seems that students with
greater cognitive abilities will make the faster progress. Some linguists
believe that there is a specific innate language learning ability that is
stronger in some students that in others.
Native language:
Students who are learning a second language
which is from the same language family as their first language have, in general
a much easier task that those who aren’t. So, for example, a Dutch child will
learn English more quickly that a Japanese child.
External
Factors:
External Factors are those that characterize
the particular language learning situation.
Curriculum:
For ESL students in particular it is
important that the totality or their educational experience is appropriate for
their needs. Language learning is less likely to place if students are fully
submersed into the mainstream program without any extra assistance or,
conversely, not allowed to be part of the mainstream until they have reached a
certain level of language proficiency.
Instruction:
Clearly, some language teachers are
better that others at providing appropriate and effective learning experiences
for the students in their classrooms. These students will make faster progress.
The same applies to maintain teachers in L2 situations. The Science teacher,
for example, who is aware that she too is responsible for the students English
language development, and makes certain accommodations, will contribute to
their linguistic development.
Culture and Status:
There is some evidence that students in situations where their own
culture has a lower status than that of the culture in which they are learning
the language make slower progress.
Motivation;
Students who
are given continuing, appropriate encouragement to learn by their teachers and
parents will generally fare better than those who aren’t. For example, students
from families that place little importance on language learning are likely to
progress less quickly.
Access to native speaker;
The opportunity to interacts with native
speakers both within and outside of the classroom is a significant advantage.
Native speaker are linguistic models and can provide appropriate feedback.
Clearly, L2 learners who have no extensive access to native speakers are likely
to make slower progress, particularly in the oral/ aural aspects of language
acquisition.